Liked The Hunger Games? Try Battle Royale – it’s better.

I was killing teenagers while you were writing Nickelodeon shows, lady.

I will not be going out and seeing The Hunger Games any time soon.  It’s not because I’m not interested or anything, it’s just that I’ve seen it already – back when it was called Battle Royale.

"Takako Chigusa" is Japanese for "angry weeaboo."

No, this isn’t another “oh my god Suzanne Collins ripped off Koushun Takami” blog post, as people have flogged that dead horse quite enough as far as I’m concerned.  It’s like people who bitch about “Lost Girl” because it’s a rip-off of Jim Butcher‘s Dresden novels – yeah, you can make an argument for it, but is it really worth the effort?  Just go enjoy the original; it’s much better.

Then I remember what my paychecks looked like.

Ah, memories. Sometimes I miss working here.

Like The Hunger Games, Battle Royale started as a novel first.   I originally came across it back in 2003 when it was translated into English, while I was working at one of the best independent bookstores in the country.  I was one of the inventory monkeys in the back that processed shipments through the computer system and then unboxed everything when it came in, so I was always watching and waiting for the next awesome thing to come in from the Baker & Taylor shipments every Tuesday (I also spent more time reading the books than putting them away, much to the consternation of my bosses who nevertheless somehow didn’t fire me).

Anyway, I knew Battle Royale was going to show up, so I put a special order in and snapped it up as soon as it hit the receiving table.  I don’t even think I put a sticker on it, I just paid for it and took it home that night, and I finished it by about 2 or 3 in the morning.

Where's the CD player on this thing?

It’s basically everything you’d want in a big, thick, dystopian novel in the vein of Stephen King’s The Running Man combined with all those horrible reality television bullshit shows like Survivor.  The whole concept is that a Japanese high school class is selected at random every year and taken to this island in the middle of nowhere, fitted with electronic bomb collars that explode if they try to escape, and are told that they need to fight their classmates to the death in order to have a chance to survive.  The whole thing is used for military research by the government and to keep the populace cowed in fear of having their own children selected for the brutal game.

The book excels at not just providing gory entertainment, but also insight into how people choose to react in insane situations.  The high school kids in the novel range in their goals from using subterfuge in order to take down their former friends and classmates and ensure their survival, allying with others, only attacking in self-defense, refusing to fight at all, or embracing their inner sociopath and mercilessly slaughtering everyone they come across.

Truth be told, there are a huge number of themes that run concurrently within both Battle Royale and The Hunger Games, such as defiance in the face of oppressive government regimes and refusal to play by the rules of a game that is inherently unfair.  There are romantic elements in both, with both having a teenage couple as protagonists, and both stories can be seen as a condemnation of materialism, mindless entertainment, and succumbing to the whole “bread and circuses” scheme that pacified both the ancient Romans and that threatens to obscure modern society’s important issues as well.

I think that a lot of Battle Royale fans are angry at the fact that The Hunger Games novel series (and now film) has become so wildly popular, while their favorite has instead remained more of a niche product.  The Japanese language version of Battle Royale came out 12 years ago, and while it might have reached cult status, it never broke into the worldwide mainstream in the same way as The Hunger Games is doing, which can leave some people pretty pissed off.

Insert obligatory "head" pun here.

This pineapple tastes funny.

The thing with the BR movie, though, is that it is incredibly violent – much as the novel is – and would never be as widely adopted as its American doppelganger.  It pretty much relegates it to the same niche as the Evil Dead series and Attack of the Killer Tomatoes, which is actually a blessing in disguise.  Whitewashing the violence in BR to a level more palatable for the young adult crowd would completely defang the story, leaving it as toothless and weak as a lion that’s fed only tofu at a vegetarian zoo.

So do yourself a favor – go and enjoy The Hunger Games, but if you want more of the same, and you’re not afraid of a little of the old ultraviolence, pick up Battle Royale in paperback or on DVD.  Judge for yourself if there was any plagiarism involved, but it truly doesn’t matter – they’re both good stories in their own right, and I think it’s more of an instance of parallel evolution than any nefarious plot by Suzanne Collins to rip off an obscure Japanese novel and movie.  One could even argue that if she had kept Battle Royale in mind, then The Hunger Games might have been that much better.


13 thoughts on “Liked The Hunger Games? Try Battle Royale – it’s better.

  1. I feel like some sort of weirdo for having absolutely zero interest in either story. Everyone I know is either watching or reading THG but me? Eh. It’s not that violence turns me off, (a look at any of my top 10 lists proves that) but something about the desperation of children fighting for their lives leaves a bad feeling in my gut. Lord of the Flies was hard for me to read for similar reasons.

    I miss the Revue sometimes. I go in occasionally but I don’t know anyone there and the employees are all snooty like we were and I wanna be all “I was a Book Revue Snob first bitch!”.

    • I feel ultra weird abut going back inside Book Revue now, even though I left on good terms with Rich and Bobby, for a lot of the same reasons – I don’t think there’s hardly anyone left that I remember. Shame, because we had a lot of fun. I still have that picture of you, me, and Derick clustered around Bruce Campbell, by the way!

      • that was an awesome night 🙂 Meeting Neil Gaiman rated slightly above that. I just didn’t appreciate how awesome it was to work there at the time.

  2. It’s funny, I saw the trailers for the Hunger Games and was like, meh. Then I saw the trailer for Battle Royale and was like HOLY FUCK I MUST SEE THIS MOVIE!!! Maybe I’m just an extremely disturbed individual….

    • You are disturbed, but in a good way.

      The book is great, it goes into a hell of a lot more detail, but it’s long as a motherfucker – we’re talking 800 pages or so. Most of the time the entire chapter is spent in describing a character, going into his or her backstory, getting into their psychology – and then killing them in a gruesome manner. The movie might be slightly more fun.

  3. Loved Battle Royale when I first saw it however long ago (before DVDs, too. It was weird laser disk thing, but not laser disk.) I had no idea it was a book.

    Another good Children in Competition to the Death Dystopian (Shortened hereafter to CCDD) is The Long Walk. Coincidentally, it’s also by Stephen King. Basically the kids walk till they drop. Or they slow below 4 mph and get gunned down by soldiers.

    Last one standing is the winner. The interesting part about it is that the sport is America’s national past time, and the kids apply to join. The kids apply to join. Why would anyone willingly play something that’s been proven to be pretty fucking fatal?

    Oh. Right.

  4. Pingback: There are only two stories that have ever been told | Fighting Monkey Press

  5. I was actually dragged out to the hunger games, and I started out against it because I’d read Battle Royale. If I hadn’t, I honestly think I could have super enjoyed the movie, aside some of the… clunky romance and a gag-reflex of Mary Sue. It really wasn’t that terrible. And it was different enough from Battle Royale that I didn’t want to cut off whatever reproductive organs a movie might have and make it choke on them.

    Haven’t read the book though, so I’m a bad judge.

    • I really think it’s a case of parallel evolution rather than one ripping off the other. Still, I prefer Battle Royale over Hunger Games. Then again, The Running Man is pretty good too – the novella, not the AHNOLD movie.

      • That makes a lot of sense. It was enjoyable, and there were some heart-in-throat moments I’m told come across far better in the book. It’s supposedly a simple read, I’d consider picking it up for some kill-time simple stuff.

  6. Pingback: BATTLE ROYALE « Written in Blood

  7. Pingback: The sincerest form of flattery? « Amateur Professional

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s